Comparing a YPS-4 authority figure to a YPS-2 narrative survivor is a categorical error because their abilities operate on different axes. The conflict here is not about destructive output, but about how submission functions as a social engine. Both characters possess low Ego scores, yet they weaponize this lack of autonomy in opposing directions. Albedo's identity is a manufactured product of Ainz's final-hour settings edit, transforming her into a tool of administrative cruelty. She uses her programmed devotion to consolidate power and dismantle nations, turning her lack of self-determination into a rigid, lethal efficiency. Conversely, Iruma's passivity—born from a lifetime of avoiding conflict—acts as a vacuum that draws others toward him. While Albedo uses her bonds to enforce a hierarchy, Iruma uses the Ring of Gluttony and his innate kindness to dismantle one. The gap between a nation-level deterrent and a school-level survivor disappears when analyzing their story functions: both are anchors for the people around them, but one anchors a regime of fear while the other anchors a community of trust. This reveals that isekai power is not always about the ability to destroy, but about the ability to define the social reality of those in the character's orbit. Albedo proves that unwavering loyalty is a weapon of erasure, while Iruma demonstrates that total adaptability is a tool for integration.