The divide between the ironic survivor and the utilitarian officer lies in whether survival is the ultimate goal or merely a foundation for something else. Because one utilizes narrative probability and the other utilizes physical ballistic magic, a direct YPS-3 comparison of their combat output is fundamentally flawed. One games the system to create comfort; the other optimizes the system to avoid risk. This cross-type gap reveals that isekai handles non-physical power not as a tool for dominance, but as a mirror for the protagonist's relationship with agency. Kazuma operates through a high Luck stat and meta-knowledge, turning the world's absurdity into a leverage point. His Growth score of 100 reflects a transition from a NEET escaping reality to a man who accepts the chaos of his party to forge genuine bonds. He uses his narrative power to build a home. Tanya, conversely, possesses an Ego of 0, viewing herself as a cog in a corporate-military machine. Her trajectory is not one of personal evolution but of systemic entrapment. Every calculated move to secure a safe rear-line position—such as her enrollment in war college—only serves to make her more indispensable to the front lines. While Kazuma bends the world to fit his desires, Tanya is bent by a world that rewards her efficiency with more danger. The contrast is stark: Kazuma finds humanity through the failure of his plans, whereas Tanya loses her autonomy through the success of hers. One finds freedom in the cracks of the system, while the other becomes the system's most efficient prisoner.