The vast delta between YPS-6 and YPS-3 renders a direct combat comparison meaningless, yet it exposes a critical truth about isekai storytelling: destructive scale often inversely correlates with narrative agency. While Milim Nava possesses the capacity to shatter planets, her life is a reactive search for stimulation to mask ancient trauma, leaving her emotionally stagnant. In contrast, Tanya Degurechaff operates within the narrow margins of City Level power, yet her conflict is far more acute. Tanya’s struggle is not against an army, but against the very concept of irrationality embodied by Being X. She treats the war as a corporate optimization problem, attempting to game a system that refuses to let her retire. This creates a sharper dramatic tension than Milim's paradoxical existence as a child-god. Milim’s story is one of regression toward vulnerability, whereas Tanya’s is a relentless, failed attempt to maintain distance from a world she despises. The lower-tier character carries the heavier intellectual burden because her survival depends on precision and logic, while the higher-tier character exists as a catastrophic variable. Ultimately, the data shows that a character who cannot rewrite physical laws but attempts to rewrite military bureaucracy offers a more complex study of will than one who can destroy a world but cannot find a friend.